At offset 44:23 of this video, Dr Greger explains:
In this video: Diabetes Reversal: Is It The Calories Or The Food? (6 mins, 2016), Dr Greger says,
In this blog article: How Not to Die from Heart Disease (2019), Dr Greger says,
Another article: (2019) Moderation Kills
A panel discussion with Michael Greger, Julieanna Hever, Milton Mills, Brenda Davis.
(3 mins) Transcript. Dr Greger's summary: "Health authorities appear to have taken the patronizing view that the public can't handle the truth and would rather the science be watered down."
Is moderation okay? No! In this 3-min video, Dr Roger Rogers explains how even tiny amounts of wrong foods (say, 5 ml of cooking oil) actually damage our tissues in so many different parts of our body. The damage is small and imperceptible. However, just like rivers cut through mountains to create valleys over long periods of time, tissue damage due to wrong foods cumulates over time to cause heart disease, inflammation, cognitive impairment, liver damage, kidney damage, and so on.
Dr Ostfeld argues that benefits from a plant-based diet lie on a continuum. We start seeing benefits from 50% threshold onwards. Howver, at 90%, we see significant benefits. And if we are suffering from a chronic illness like heart disease, Dr Ostfeld emphasizes 100%.
In this panel discussion (9 mins, 2017), the question to the panel was: Let's say we have two individuals A and B: they both follow these WFPB guidelines like zero processed foods (on chips, no sodas, no cookies, … no added oils and no added sugars. But the difference between them is: A eats plant-only; B eats mostly plants but some chicken and fish occasionally. What's the difference between them in terms of their likelihood for preventing and curing chronic lifestyle diseases?
Dr Baxter Montgomery:
Dr Pam Popper:
Yes! See these articles:
Food addictions: WFPB doctors explain that meat, fish, eggs, dairy, processed foods, oil and sugar are addictive! See Which Foods Are Addictive? and Overcoming Addictions. Now imagine cigarette smoking or alcohol addiction. How would we de-addict ourselves? What would our approach be? Would moderation work for you? Maybe for some people. For the vast majority of us, it's best to draw a clear line and not to touch alcohol and smoking at all. A similar approach is best for addictive foods too.
Moderation is a slippery slope: Once we eat 'a little bit' of an addictive food, we feel like eating more. That's how addiction works — we get urges to engage in an addictive activity repeatedly :)
While I may be able to execute 'moderation' when I'm in a joyful and calm state of mind; my ability to execute 'moderation' diminishes when I'm facing stressful situations.
Stress: Stress could be triggered by friction with loved ones; stress at work; unexpected events that cause us grief or anxiety or anger or fear or other negative emotions. It's exactly during such situations that our boundaries play an important role. During these times, it's easy to eat 2.0 servings of a 'healthy packaged food' instead of 1.0 and we kick off a negative cycle of 'over-eating → stress → over-eating → stress → …'
With a support person (spouse, siblings or parents), it's easier to practice moderation (the support person helps us). But what happens to those who are single or without supportive partners? It's considerably difficult for them because it requires a lot of self discipline.
I find it easier to have strict boundaries like 'no sugar ever, no matter what happens'. In stressful times, when our will power is being tested, strict boundaries are difficult to break; on the other hand, when we practice 'moderation', we succumb to the proverbial 'slippery slope'; we start consuming multiple servings of "a little bit" of an addictive food.
Yama, Niyama: People like me need hard boundaries: black and white; not grey. This is very similar to the first limb of Ashtanga Yoga: 'yama' :) We should simply not do certain things, ever.